Showing posts with label Christian Petrozza. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christian Petrozza. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

A Clash of Epics: 300: Rise of an Empire & Noah



A Clash of Epics: 300: Rise of an Empire & Noah

     After an intensely long hiatus from Petrozza’s Ladder, I have decided to test the waters once more after much coaxing from fellow film friends and aficionados. After about a year and a half of putting reviews of films on my facebook profile I figure it is time to resurrect this old thing and put it to fun use. So enjoy.

     What better way to kick off this blog again than to start with a pairing of films that fall under my favorite genre, ye olde Sword and Sandal Epics!! Today we have what can be known as nothing else but a Parallequel to Frank Miller’s 300 and a creative and bold retelling of a Biblical Legend. Both films in their own right have surpassed and created new definitions to the genre of sword and sandal epics through their overall style and creative liberties with history and legend. So lower your sails and raise your shields, for when both epics take place on torrid waters, there is bound to be adventure!


     As many a reviewer will tell you, Hollywood’s history of releasing a good sequel or prequel to a franchise film is quite a fickle beast, often smashing profits on to the rocks; that being said, 300:ROE takes a different and compelling narrative route, so as to not alienate the first time watcher and to still excite the eager 300 fan. 300 and 300:ROE run on PARALLEL STORYLINES!

     In making this genius move 300:ROE was able to introduce a slew of new ideas and styles to the battle epic, while still maintaining the ‘artfully violent’ medium that everyone devoured in the original picture. 300:ROE takes us away from the battle-hardened city-state of Sparta and over to the capitol of archaic democracy, Athens, now under threat by the tidal wave of Xerxes's onslaught.

     Unlike the original 300 Spartans, the motivations and philosophies of the Athenian soldier vary from our expected testosterone-driven hoplites who kick people into holes. The lead character is a warrior and naval commander hell-bent on the protection of all Greeks from this foreign invasion. Knowing he has an army made up of farmers, militia, and tradesmen, he must take his battles to the sea and use guile to overcome the armada of the film’s, and in my opinion, one of Hollywood’s most awesome female villains in a terribly long time, Artemisia.

     Now let’s move away from any more info on that (because the movie will tell you the rest) and on to some of the artistic and narrative choices. In 300 we saw some intense saturation and sepia tones of reds, maroons, and blacks, as well as a great use of artistically texturing blood in an almost matte style. This lent itself beautifully to the original Graphic Novel style of hard shadows, gory fights, and intense close-ups. 300:ROE has kept much of the style but changed the palette to justify the Athenian and naval theme with cold blue’s and turquoise tones. As an added dynamic, we notice the blood is given  a glossy shine. Much of the film takes place on torrid, stormy seas so I suppose they thought it was appropriate; However, I was not a fan of the glossy blood effect, it made those slow motion death strokes a little distracting, almost as if the blood had a shiny bald spot, but that is a small detail.

     As for narrative, 300:ROE builds the tension of its story alongside the battle of Thermopylae, yet still gaining intensity on its own front as the Athenians face sword and fire on land and sea. The film lends a creative and dynamic contrast to the first film by taking the battle to the water, which I believe was a much needed move. Too many sword and sandal battles happen on land, the only exception being pirate films, so it is very refreshing to see the use of naval tactics mixed with romantically artistic face to face combat.

     As for casting, I thought all the choices were great, it is good to see some familiar, yet not too familiar faces grace lead roles in the film such as Sullivan Stapleton and Hans Matheson. This really helped in acquiring a mystery and organic approach to developing a character through audience discovery. That being said, the woman who stole the entire show was the deadly and beautiful Eva Green as Artemisia. For a long time I have been disappointed at the ill or clumsy use of female characters, especially the villains, but for some reason, every time Eva Green graces the screen with her intense gaze and seductive yet foreboding voice I cannot help but wonder why she isn’t in more films. Green really captures the pent up vengeance of a tortured soul with the ambition, mythos, and military mind of a Hellenistic commander. Her presence on screen is powerful, and not because of her muscles! She is shown to be very short and slender in the film, so much of the fear she instills is in her Napoleonic ambition and wrath. It is hard to explain perfectly, but to be quite honest, we’d all be in serious trouble if her and Darth Vader ever got married. 


     Before I finish this, there’s a sex scene that really takes Oscar Wilde’s quote on Sex and Power very literally, and it is a great scene.

     Overall, this film was brilliant entertainment, I would argue just as good as 300. As for history people bitching and complaining about inaccuracies, I’m just going to sit here and stare at you for a bit and enjoy how much pain you are in over a film mainly based on a comic.



     I can honestly say that a new type of alternative genre has been born through the making of this film. Darren Aronofsky has taken some great liberties on an age old legend and brought new light to approaching religious tales. The secret? Don’t look at them as religion! Look at them as creation stories, myths, fables and legends, passed down over centuries to the point that they have entered the realm of fantasy, and that is exactly what he did. Noah has melded the gap between religious epics and the fantasy genre in a creative and moving dialogue through the dark controversial realms of fire and brimstone and good God, bad God (well in the bible’s chronology, the other way around :p).

     The overall design, lore, and narrative had a wonderful hybrid of fantastical themes that I would like to coin as…..
Wait for it….

BIBLE PUNK!!!!

     Now hear me out, I know there’s bible punk music, but that’s not what I mean. In the fantastical styles of cyber, and steam punk there now needs to be room for another alternative style. A style which uses angelic light as a volatile yet useable source of energy, and where the elemental beings cast out by ‘the creator’ still roam the earth as a tribe of rock ents (pretty much). The film also shows a pangea-like world that is caught in a pre-apocalyptic limbo of Iron Age industrialism (check out those iron welding helmets!) and creationist (in a hippie kind of way) guardians. It is actually a tonne cooler than it sounds and the special effects are astounding, it is certainly the kind of film you want to see in AVX.

     As for casting, I was quite surprised at the choice of Russell Crowe; although I love his work I did not expect him to be cast in this role, but once the story takes off you can really see that gentle giant-meets-raging bull surface in all the right parts. Emma Watson is also in it, and of course she is great in it but the film does not revolve around her, as I was worried it might, but she plays an integral role in testing Noah’s moral grounds. An honourable mention also goes to the very quirky role of Methuselah who is played by Anthony Hopkins, and Ray Winstone who plays the animalistic ‘son of cain’ Tubal. Everyone played their part well and although the film does stretch a whole 2 hours and 20 minutes the change in stakes and plot intensity give it a very seamless flow.

     So if you want to see what Waterworld could have been like if it was written in biblical times and then plunged into a new alternative fantasy genre, you should check it out. It was quite an intense and heavy film, minus the happy and preachy attitude that old bible films took (which doesn’t mean I don’t like Ben Hur or The 10 Commandments, they are still spectacular and unbeatable in their genre).

Well, that was a mouthful for an intro back to Petrozza’s ladder! Be sure to comment, like, subscribe, and all that good stuff.

Christian A.V. Petrozza

    

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

No Choice: Twitter is the New Media Networking 'Man'


Some of You May Remember my old post about Twitter ruining television during an episode of
Fringe and my hatred for a site that resembled an elaborate Facebook status that has celeb appeal. Well it seems after years of resisting this bird that looms over the media vein that is the internet it has finally pecked its way into my necessities, in the same way dirty cops force drug dealers to give them a cut in Superfly, twitter has made me cave in. I have an account.

It all started with Charlie Sheen, as most good stories do. His controversial and viral tigerblood internship got my opportunity clock ticking and I knew I would have to get the account if I wanted to be his media intern. So just like one in a million people, I gave it a shot.

Twitter is still not my favorite thing in the world, for me it is a networking necessity, a tool, not a means to communicate casually. For myself it is to find the media and film workers I have dreamed of working with, and follow them, keep in touch with how they network, and slowly but surely network with others in the same position as me. It is also a wonderful way to self promote, now another necessity. After Twitter has come into my life I realize posting links and videos on facebook is near useless when I could post them somewhere where potential employment interests are waiting to follow and get follow-backs. Posting shout outs to those looking for new artists and interesting online channels, blogs, and film makers makes getting viewers and fans very easy. All because of one little virtual blue bird.

I will admit I have made lists to help me keep in touch with friends and such, and it is fun to Tweet about how you liked the last film you watched, or how your film project is going, but you see? When it comes down to it, it's all about branding yourself for all to see and potentially take interest in. I hate to say it boys and girls, ladies and gentlemen.....If you are contemplating a job in media....Get Twitter!

Christian A.V. Petrozza

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Human Virality: Kevin MacDonald and Ridley Scott show us 'Life In a Day'

On July 24th 2010 Director Kevin MacDonald and Producer/Director Ridley Scott posted an international challenge on Youtube for anyone, with any camera, to film that exact day, morning to night, and show us, Life in a Day.

The objectives for those filming around the globe were prompted by questions like "what do you fear?", "What do you carry in your pockets?", "Where do you work?", and so on. This footage would be edited down into a 90 minute film to be screened at the Sundance film festival.



Photocred- Christian A.V. Petrozza
I had personally partook in the venture and filmed a few tapes of footage upon the designated day. In total, the amount of footage that was collected from around the world consisted of over 4,500 hours. Although I was happy to find out one of my clips made it into the top 100 hours, it did not make it into the final cut, but their end product was impressive.
Last night, Life in a Day was screened at the festival and was also live streamed on their designated Youtube Channel for the whole world to see. The concept and ability to simultaneously show the world people, places, and opinions they had never seen or experienced before made the "eventness factor" of watching it on my simple laptop mind-blowing. The film was intended to be a way of developing human interaction and understanding of different people, classes, cultures, dreams, and beliefs. From the gardener of an oil prince in Dubai, to a living-large American speeding in a Lamborghini, the film as captured by countless people around the world, makes us laugh, cry, cheer, and fall in love.
The intention of using virality as a means of international unity and understanding was used to its full potential by the team of Life in a Day and much like the films made by Ridley Scott, convey a fair, engaging, and loving view of all people, places, and things. This new avenue of producing a mainstream production through a viral vein has given a whole new interaction with Hollywood and the world, rather than Hollywood versus the World.

Christian A.V. Petrozza

Saturday, February 27, 2010

The Rain of Realism: Gaming crosses into Hollywood Borders

A Special Thanks to my Friend and housemate Charlie for bringing this game to my attention.

Ever wish you could watch a movie and interact with it through it's characters? Kissing the girl, punching the villain, or interrogating the tough suspects?

As of February 23rd a game by Quantic Dream by the name of Heavy Rain was released. Labeled as a Film Noir thriller (my favourite) the game immerses you into a film-like story, taking you on an interactive ride as several characters as they try to figure out the mystery of the oregami killer, a merciless and mysterious child murderer.

Now you must be thinking "aren't all video games interactive?" well of course, but the game's graphics and style as you will see in the trailer and review videos approach the gameplay and cinematics as completely immersed into one another. Many games limit your movement or improve graphics during cinematics before they switch back to the gameplay. The design of the game allows you to play with the most detailed and consistent graphics to date, almost bordering photorealism, and with a great soundtrack and compelling mystery I find it very hard to call it a videogame instead of a movie.

The nature of the movement-sensored gameplay and controls during the game do not take away from the camera positioning or cinematic techniques that are simulated in the game. Some reviewers wonder if this cross-over between cinematic storytelling and gameplay together is a watershed moment in video game and film technology.

If in a few years we are able to be part of our favourite movies by "playing them" would it be a cool new improvement? Or should we keep a healthy barrier between Hollywood and our ever evolving games?

I don't know about the rest of you, but I wouldn't mind fighting as russell crowe while watching Gladiator or Chasing a bomb maker through Madagascar as Daniel Craig in Casino Royale.


Christian A.V. Petrozza


Share/Bookmark we ♥ sharing

Friday, February 19, 2010

First Post!



Hello Blogger! I am Christian Petrozza a competitive fencer, independent film maker, and film major. Since I have recently been injured and reading week is coming up, I thought I would begin re-posting some of my old blogs from the other Blog I write on Transmedia TV. I will also be posting some new content as well once all my blog posts have been re-enstated on this site. On this blog I will look into popular media, technology, the sport of fencing (the best sport evar!) and mostly my defence for films which I enjoy but critics hate, which has been the case soo many times before, pretty much since siskel died. I hope you enjoy my posts, interests, and the occasional anecdote or experience.